Library / Commentary on Joshua, Volume I

Book I — De Iosue: Caput IX — On the election, and the inauguration, of Joshua as ruler and prince of the people

Question XXV. (marg.) How were the Urim otherwise called?

In this place of Numbers 27 [the Urim] are called haurim [הָאוּרִים], with he [ה] prefixed — which the Hebrews call the “notificative” [article] — that it might, namely, be more expressed, and [that] that reckoning of interrogating the Lord might be indicated. Elsewhere, however, with that he removed, [they are called] Urim. And that [in] a twofold [way]: for either solitarily, Urim, as here and [in] 1 Kings [Sam.] 28; or conjointly, as elsewhere they are always called Urim and Thummim. And the former name indeed signifies “illuminations,” “illuminating [ones],” or “lights”; but the latter, “perfections,” or “perfecting [ones],” as also in the Chaldee Targum, Uraia and Thummaia: the Greeks rendered [them] τὰ δῆλα [“the manifest things”], δήλωσιν καὶ ἀλήθειαν [“manifestation and truth”], φωτισμοὺς καὶ τελειώσεις [“illuminations and perfections”], φωτίζοντας καὶ τελείους [“illuminating and perfect”]. Our interpreter [renders them] “doctrine and truth”; or [understands] that the Priests themselves are adorned with these ensigns, or something like [that], as seemed fitting. St. Jerome (on Hosea 3): “Teraphim,” he says, “the Septuagint interpreted δήλους [‘manifest’]; Aquila φωτισμούς [‘illuminations’]; and these same are ἐν λογείῳ (or λογίῳ), that is, in the rational.” But truly Aelian narrates (bk. 14 of the Various History) [that] among the Egyptians anciently the Judges were Priests—

(col. 208)

—and [that] the chief of these was he who was of all the most advanced in age, and that this one judged all the others. “It behooved, moreover” (that I may now retain his very words) “[that] he himself be a most just man, and sparing to no one at all. He had, moreover, an image about [his] neck, of a sapphire stone; and that image was called Ἀλήθεια [Aletheia], ‘Truth.’” For the ancient Egyptians emulated, in many things, the institutions of the Jews. And at Hierapolis, he who interrogated the oracles was ἀρχιερεύς [archiereus, “high-priest”], as Lucian says (in On the Syrian Goddess).

To cite this page

Nicolaus Serarius, S.J., “Question XXV. (marg.) How were the Urim otherwise called?,” in Commentary on Joshua, Volume I, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/serarius-joshua-1/145-question-xxv-marg-how-were-the-urim-otherwise-called/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.