Library / Commentary on Joshua, Volume I

Book I — De Iosue: Caput III — On Joshua's deeds; and specifically now on the first of those deeds, which is the Amalekite war

Question XII. (marg.) What did Aaron and Hur do with Moses?

These [two] saw the utmost labor of Moses in prayer, and saw [his] constancy, [and] the extreme weariness and weakness of [his] whole body. Therefore they resolved to bring him a remedy and aid — not by dissuading [him], lest he continue in prayer (for they clearly perceived how much of protection there was in his prayers), but by urging [him] to sit, and to [take] a slight relief of the arms. And at once — [since] not garments, not a mattress of herbs, not, in fine, anything soft was to hand (and if [any] were, they knew [that] Moses would spurn and reject such a thing) — they placed under [him] some stone, found by chance on that dry slope of Horeb, [and] took care [to set it] under him, that he might sit upon it.

(col. 72)

Then they took both hands of him [as he] sat — one indeed on the right, the other on the left — and thus, through the whole remaining part of the day, they held [them] up, so that they might always be lifted to heaven. For this [is] what the Hebrew word signifies — whatever Oleaster may wish against [it] — as both our [Latin] and the Septuagint interpreters rendered [it]. But Philo, at the cited place, seems to hand down [that] the hands of Moses were not grasped and held up by anyone, but that, by a new prodigy, they — [as if] having wings — flew about in the air divinely, and thus remained aloft until night. But he [Philo] is contrary to this text, as we have seen, which, in words so clear, attributes the holding-up to Aaron and Hur, standing on this side and that.

Nor indeed can it be doubted [that] they too joined their prayers together with him [Moses] from the beginning of the day, and now went on further to join [them], so that, while they propped the arms of the other [man], they were most erect [intent] in mind toward God. For what [would] good and grave men [do]? Could they — in so great a crisis of affairs, while the sum of things is at stake; while [these men], who could otherwise have remained in the camp, and there consoled the people, and, if perchance any commotion should arise, restrained [it]; [could they], as they behold Moses, on that slope, pouring out prayers and tears so intently, so assiduously, with so great fatigue, [and] showing to God that sacred, sacred rod, as a certain pledge, as it were, of aid — [could they] have been merely idle spectators? [Would they] not [rather have been] with him, unfed [fasting], praying-together, weeping-together?

But it can still be doubtful why they too did not have need of sitting, and of a prop for the hands. To me two [reasons] seem [likely]. One indeed, [that] they, when they were weary, sat at times, and let down [their] hands; and did not so fight against the heaviness and discomfort of their body — because, namely, they observed [that there was] not so much of moment in their own [hands] as in Moses’s hands and prayers. Nay, since they held Moses’s hands, they could, whenever they wished, pause; and Moses meanwhile raised up [his] hands by his own strength for that while. The other [reason], [that] they [were] therefore less fatigued, because Moses’s soul was borne with greater impulse and effort toward God, and conceived [its] prayers [more intensely]. And [it] is wont, thence, [that] the vigor of the body slackens and is weakened somewhat — as experience teaches also in the studies of letters and in [literary] compositions. But what I said [about] the aid spontaneously brought to Moses by them, Josephus thinks [was] done by Moses’s order.

To cite this page

Nicolaus Serarius, S.J., “Question XII. (marg.) What did Aaron and Hur do with Moses?,” in Commentary on Joshua, Volume I, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/serarius-joshua-1/049-question-xii-marg-what-did-aaron-and-hur-do-with-moses/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.