Library / Theological Commentaries, Part III: On the Division of the Divine Will into First and Second, and on the Universal Extent of the Restored Order

I–XXXIII · The First and Second Will in Chrysostom, the Greek Writers, and the Latins

Section XXIII

In these is contained the rationale for resolving the question how it happens that so many fall away from the attainment of salvation, although the preceding salvific will of God extends itself to all and anticipates all with internal and external benefits. Evidently the knot cannot be untied unless the divine benefits with which men are endowed are accurately divided into two classes. The first of these consists of those which are owed χάριτι μόνῃ, to grace alone, flow ἀπὸ ἀγαθότητος μόνης, from benignity alone, and of which God is not only the principal cause but also the sole and adequate cause. But to the second are referred those of which God is indeed the principal cause, but not likewise the sole and adequate cause, since men themselves must also be joined as subordinate causes. For just as both the universal salvific will and the internal and external gifts which are poured forth most abundantly upon the whole race of men belong to the former class, so to the latter belongs the very attainment of salvation and eternal beatitude, which is conferred only upon those who, after God and with God, have rendered themselves not unworthy of so excellent a good.

And to this tends what Theophylact taught in the last words1; to this also tends what he writes2 when considering the words of John3, ἦν τὸ φῶς τὸ ἀληθινόν, ὃ φωτίζει πάντα ἄνθρωπον ἐρχόμενον εἰς τὸν κόσμον, “that was the true light which enlightens every man coming into the world”:

Καὶ πῶς, φησί, φωτίζει πάντα ἄνθρωπον, ὅπου γε βλέπομεν τινὰς ἐσκοτισμένους; ὅσον τὸ ἐφ᾽ ἑαυτῷ πάντας φωτίζει· εἰπὲ γάρ μοι, οὐ πάντες λογικοί; οὐ πάντες φύσει γινώσκοντες τὸ καλὸν καὶ τοὐναντίον; οὐκ ἔχοντες δύναμιν ἐννοῆσαι ἀπὸ τῶν κτισμάτων τὸν κτίστην, ὥστε ὁ λόγος ὁ δοθεὶς ἡμῖν, καὶ παιδαγωγῶν ἡμᾶς φύσει, ὃς καὶ φυσικὸς νόμος καλεῖται, οὗτος ἂν κληθείη φῶς, τὸ δοθὲν ἡμῖν παρὰ Θεοῦ· εἰ δέ τινες κακῶς τῷ λόγῳ ἐχρήσαντο, ἑαυτοὺς ἐσκότισαν,

And how, he says, does he enlighten every man, when we see so many darkened? As far as concerns himself, he enlightens all. For tell me, I pray, are not all rational? Do not all by nature know good and evil? Do not all possess the power to know the Creator from creatures? Thus reason, given to us and instructing us by nature4, which is also called the natural law, may be called the light granted to us by God. But if some have used reason perversely, they have darkened themselves.

Therefore the divine light goes before all, assists all, and invites all to fellowship in the supreme truth; but only those walk in the light, after the darkness has been shaken off and dispelled, and enjoy the sweetness of truth, who neither desert God as he goes before them nor ungratefully reject the benefits offered, being no less hostile to themselves than to God. This they seem to have had before their eyes who, as the same Theophylact reports5, were accustomed to resolve τὴν ἔνστασιν ταύτην, the proposed difficulty, in this manner:

φωτίζει, φησίν, ὁ Κύριος πάντα ἄνθρωπον τὸν ἐρχόμενον εἰς τὸν κόσμον, ἤτοι εἰς τάξιν βελτίονα, καὶ σπουδάζοντα κοσμῆσαι τὴν οἰκείαν ψυχήν, καὶ μὴ ἐᾶσαι ἄκοσμόν τε καὶ ἀκαλλῆ,

The Lord, they say, enlightens every man coming into the world, that is, those who aspire to a better state6 and expend effort to adorn their own soul and do not permit it to be unadorned and ugly.

Footnotes

  1. No. 22. ↩

  2. In the commentary on John I. 9. ↩

  3. John I. 9. ↩

  4. With these may very suitably be compared the things which the martyr Justin has: whether when, in Apology II, no. 8, he mentions τὸ ἔμφυτον παντὶ γένει ἀνθρώπων σπέρμα τοῦ λόγου, “the seed of the Word implanted in the whole human race”; or when in the same place he praises, now κατὰ λόγον βιοῦν σπουδάζοντας, “those who take pains to order their life according to the rule of the Word,” and then τοὺς οὐ κατὰ σπερματικοῦ λόγου μέρος (βιοῦν σπουδάζοντας), ἀλλὰ κατὰ τὴν τοῦ παντὸς λόγου, ὅ ἐστι Χριστοῦ, γνῶσιν καὶ θεωρίαν, “those who endeavor to institute their life not according to some part of the disseminated Word, but according to the knowledge and contemplation of the whole Word, that is, of Christ”; or when at no. 10 he writes, ὅσα καλῶς ἀεὶ ἐφθέγξαντο καὶ εὗρον οἱ φιλοσοφήσαντες ἢ νομοθετήσαντες, κατὰ λόγου μέρος εὑρέσεως καὶ θεωρίας ἐστὶ πονηθέντα αὐτοῖς, “whatever things philosophers or legislators ever said or devised excellently, they elaborated by discovering and considering the Word in some part”; or when he adds concerning Socrates that Christ was known to him ἀπὸ μέρους, in some part, λόγος γὰρ ἦν καὶ ἔστιν ὁ ἐν παντὶ ὤν, καὶ διὰ τῶν προφητῶν προειπὼν τὰ μέλλοντα γίνεσθαι, καὶ δι᾽ ἑαυτοῦ ὁμοιοπαθοῦς γενομένου καὶ διδάξαντος ταῦτα, “for he was and is that Word who is in all things, who both foretold through the prophets the things that were to come to pass, and taught these things through himself when he had assumed our nature”; or when at no. 13 he establishes, ἕκαστός τις ἀπὸ μέρους τοῦ σπερματικοῦ θείου λόγου τὸ συγγενὲς ὁρῶν καλῶς ἐφθέγξατο, “whoever contemplates some part of the disseminated divine Word connatural to himself has spoken excellently”; or when he infers, ὅσα οὖν παρὰ πᾶσι καλῶς εἴρηται, ἡμῶν τῶν Χριστιανῶν ἐστι, “whatever things, therefore, have been said excellently among all others belong to us Christians”; or when, in Apology I, no. 46, he publishes this profession of his faith: τὸν Χριστὸν πρωτότοκον τοῦ Θεοῦ εἶναι ἐδιδάχθημεν, καὶ προεμηνύσαμεν λόγον ὄντα, οὗ πᾶν γένος ἀνθρώπων μετέσχε· καὶ οἱ μετὰ λόγου βιώσαντες, Χριστιανοί εἰσι, κἂν ἄθεοι ἐνομίσθησαν, “we have learned that Christ is the firstborn of God and have declared above (nos. 5-10-12-23-32) that he is that Word of whom the whole race of men is a participant, so that those who have lived according to the rule of the Word are Christians, although they were considered atheists.” Clement of Alexandria, in the first and sixth books of the Stromata, in the Protreptic Discourse, and Tertullian, in the Apologeticum, chaps. XXIII-XLV, confirm this altogether distinguished doctrine with not a few testimonies. ↩

  5. In the commentary on John I. 9. ↩

  6. Isaac Habert discusses excellently, in the second book of The Theology of the Greek Fathers on Grace, formulas of speaking akin to this one, which occur not infrequently among the Greek Fathers and writers. ↩

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Carlo Passaglia, “Section XXIII,” in Theological Commentaries, Part III: On the Division of the Divine Will into First and Second, and on the Universal Extent of the Restored Order, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/passaglia-commentaries-3/026-section-xxiii/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.