Library / Commentary on Joshua, Volume II

After the Wars: Caput XXIV

Question XVIII. Whether, with Joseph, more other Patriarchs [were] buried at Shechem?

Junius denies [that] other Patriarchs [were] buried with Joseph in the Sichemite field (on Acts 7); and his opinion can be confirmed from Josephus, who, when [he] had narrated the death of the Patriarchs (bk. 2 Antiquities, ch. 4), at length subjoins: τὰ τούτων μὲν τὰ σώματα κομίσαντες μετὰ χρόνον, αὐτῶν οἱ ἀπόγονοι, καὶ οἱ παῖδες ἔθαψαν ἐν Χεβρῶνι [ta toutōn men ta sōmata komisantes meta chronon, autōn hoi apogonoi, kai hoi paides ethapsan en Chebrōni, “but the bodies of these [Patriarchs], their descendants and children, having carried [them] after a time, buried in Hebron”]. But first, among us Christians, of much greater authority is St. Stephen, who (Acts 7:15) says: “Jacob went down into Egypt, and died, he and our fathers. And [they] were translated into Sichem [Shechem], and [were] placed in the sepulchre which [Abraham] bought for a price of silver from the sons of Hemor [the] son of Sichem.” Second: D. Jerome, in the Epitaph of Paula: “Thence (from Sichem), turning aside, Paula saw the sepulchres of the twelve Patriarchs.” What [is] clearer? And concerning this, against his [own] Junius, Beza says (on Acts 7): “D. Jerome [is] an eye-witness, to whom faith [is] rather to be given than to Josephus.” Third: Yet Josephus can be [so] explained that [he] disagrees in nothing from St. Stephen, and [from] the divine Jerome. For [he] subjoins in the same place [that], after the burial of those Patriarchs in Hebron, Joseph’s bones [were] buried. [It] could therefore come to pass [that], at first, the bones of the other Patriarchs were entombed at Hebron, but afterward [were] translated to Sichem. The words of that [Josephus], which are annexed to the cited [passage], are: τὰ δὲ Ἰωσήπου ὀστᾶ ὕστερον, ὅτε μετανέστησαν ἐκ τῆς Αἰγύπτου οἱ Ἑβραῖοι, εἰς τὴν Χαναναίαν ἐκόμισαν· οὕτως γὰρ αὐτὸς ὁ Ἰώσηπος ἐξώρκισε [ta de Iōsēpou osta hysteron, hote metanestēsan ek tēs Aigyptou hoi Hebraioi, eis tēn Chananaian ekomisan; houtōs gar autos ho Iōsēpos exōrkise, “but Joseph’s bones later, when the Hebrews migrated out of Egypt, they carried into Canaan; for so Joseph himself had adjured [them]”]. Fourth: On the contrary, Junius wants [it that] Jacob’s body — which is distinctly written (Gen. 50) [to have been] buried at Hebron — [was] first deported to Sichem, and thence afterward to Hebron: because in the Syriac and Arabic [it] is μετετέθη εἰς Σιχέμ, καὶ ἐτέθη ἐν μνημείῳ [metetethē eis Sichem, kai etethē en mnēmeiō, “he was transferred to Shechem, and placed in a tomb”]. But unless this single [reading] be referred to the bones of those [patriarchs, the codex] is rather to be called faulty [mendosus] than [that] an absurd thing — against the express text of Genesis — be admitted. Fifth: Finally, Beza thus confutes his [own] Junius: “First: if ‘from the sons of Hemor’ [παρὰ τῶν υἱῶν Ἐμμὸρ, à filiis Emor] you construe not with the verb ἠγόρασατο [ēgorasato, ‘he bought’] — ‘bought’ — but with the verb ἐτέθη [etethē, ‘was placed’] — ‘was placed’ — the transposition [traiectio] would be exceedingly harsh. Then, whence can [it] be clear [that] the threshing-floor of Athad [Atad] — situated at the very crossing of the Jordan (for there [they] first halted, who were conducting Jacob’s funeral) — is Sichem? And even if [it] is Sichem, why would Stephen have preferred to name the sons of Chamur [Hemor], rather than either to report the name of Sichem, or to employ the relative ἐκεῖθεν [ekeithen, ‘thence’], ‘from that place’? But if, even this [phrase] ‘from the sons of Emmor’ we wish so to construe, nothing hinders [that], just as [we say] of Joseph, so also [we] may say [that] the bones of his remaining brothers too were together deported to Sichem — which afterward [were] translated by the sons of Emmor, that is, from the Sichemite territory, to [the field of] Ephron [at Hebron], with only Joseph’s bones left at Sichem. And in this way, [there would] indeed [have] been at Sichem cenotaphs [empty tombs], concerning which Jerome treats: but in the cave of Hebron [were] the true sepulchres of the Patriarchs, concerning which the historian Josephus writes in the cited place.”

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Nicolaus Serarius, S.J., “Question XVIII. Whether, with Joseph, more other Patriarchs [were] buried at Shechem?,” in Commentary on Joshua, Volume II, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/serarius-joshua-2/352-question-xviii-whether-with-joseph-more-other-patriarchs/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.