Library / Commentary on Joshua, Volume II

After the Wars: Caput XX

Question I. What [are] the cities of refuge?

[They] are called cities of refuge or of flight [confugium], to which those who fled were safe and secure from some impending danger. And of this kind [there] are now, and of old (as [will] appear below) [there] were, not only cities, but also other places, which were called “asyla” [asylums/sanctuaries]. [This is] because — from “συλᾶν [sylan]” (not, however, as [was] thought by Covarruvias, bk. 2 of the Variae Resolutiones, ch. 20, & by Ludovicus Vives, on St. Augustine’s City [of God], bk. 1, ch. 34, [from] “συρᾶν [syran]”: for [as to] what Servius says, bk. 2 of the Aeneid, [that] “ἄσυλον [asylon]” [is] as [if] “ἄσυρον [asyron],” from “σύρειν [syrein]”) — among the Greeks [συλᾶν] is “to seize [rob], to despoil, and to violate,” and the same “a” [alpha] is a mark of privation [the alpha-privative], [so that] places of this kind protect and defend someone, lest he can be seized, despoiled, or violated by anyone. For just as the natural places of each thing preserve it, by a certain natural force (Aristotle being witness), so asylums [preserve] those who flee to them, by a certain moral force and right, which is called [the right] “τῆς ἀσυλίας [tēs asylias]” [“of inviolability”]. Ovid, bk. 3 of the Fasti:

“When Romulus had surrounded a grove with a high rock, ‘Whoever thou art, flee hither,’ he said, ‘thou shalt be safe.’”

And concerning the same [thing], Virgil, bk. 7 of the Aeneid:

“Hence [he shows] the huge grove, which fierce Romulus made an asylum, and shows, under a cold rock, the Lupercal.”

And so of asylums speak Cicero in the Verrines, Livy bk. 1, Lactantius bk. 2 ch. 7, [and] others. Moreover, hence also, in Euripides, [it] is called “ἄσυλος γῆ [asylos gē]” [“inviolable land”]; in the Author of 2 Maccabees ch. 4, “ἄσυλος τόπος [asylos topos]” [“an inviolable place”]; in Synesius, Epistle 58, “ἄσυλος τράπεζα [asylos trapeza]” [“an inviolable table”]; in Philostratus, “ἄσυλος αἰδώς [asylos aidōs]” [“inviolable reverence”] — that is, inviolable, and in no way to be despoiled, nor to be harassed by any plunderer — [whether] land, place, table, [or] statue. And therefore [there] are several kinds of asylums; and these cities of refuge make up one [kind] of them, which in the 70 [are] “αἱ πόλεις τοῦ φυγαδευτηρίου [hai poleis tou phygadeutēriou]” [“the cities of the place-of-refuge”], “τῶν φυγαδευτηρίων [tōn phygadeutēriōn],” “εἰς φυγαδευτήριον [eis phygadeutērion]”; and simply “φυγαδευτήρια [phygadeutēria]” [“places-of-refuge”], “φυγαδεῖον [phygadeion]” (Num. 35). But in Hebrew, “hare miklat,” that is, “cities of retention or of reception.” For “Miklat” is said by some properly to signify a collecting [gathering] or a retaining; and in those cities the manslayers had to contain [keep] themselves. To others, the same word means “contraction [a drawing-together],” from Lev. 22:23; but into those cities the manslayers were drawn together [gathered], for the sake of refuge.

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Nicolaus Serarius, S.J., “Question I. What [are] the cities of refuge?,” in Commentary on Joshua, Volume II, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/serarius-joshua-2/306-question-i-what-are-the-cities-of-refuge/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.