Library / Commentary on Joshua, Volume II

After the Wars: Caput XVIII — Concerning the second division of the land among the seven remaining tribes; and specifically of the Benjaminite portion [De secunda terrae in septem residuas tribus divisione: ac speciatim de Beniaminia portione]

Question IX. Why did the tabernacle afterward emigrate [depart] from Shiloh?

In three places the Scripture plainly explains the cause why [the tabernacle] forsook Shiloh. In the first, generally, [it] says [that there] had been sins, and the wickedness and improbity of the Israelite people (Jer. 7, v. 12): “Go,” says the Lord, “to my place in Shiloh, where my name dwelt; and see what I did to it for the malice of my people Israel.” In the second, the general cause is put [as] the same; but specifically one kind of sin, and that indeed the gravest, [is] touched [upon] — idolatry (Psalm 77, v. 56): “And they tempted and provoked the most high God, and kept not his testimonies; and they turned away, and kept not the covenant; just as their fathers, [they] were turned into a perverse purpose. They stirred him to anger on their hills, and provoked him to jealousy with their graven images. And he rejected the tabernacle [of] Shiloh, his tabernacle, where he dwelt among men.” In the third place, another kind of sin — which clung to certain priests — is noted (1 Sam. ch. 2, 3, & 4), where I explain this very [thing] at greater length. Some other [reasons] can [be sought] from the place into which — after the brief sojourn and pilgrimage at Nobe — the tabernacle emigrated (2 Chron. 1): namely, from the tribe of Juda, that is, from Jerusalem, from Mount Sion, from the city of David. And all these [the Psalm] intimated, and comprehended [them] under the one [heading] of God’s benevolence and election — the same Psalm 77, v. 67 & following: “The Lord rejected the tabernacle of Joseph, and chose not the tribe of Ephraim,” for the aforesaid causes, “but he chose the tribe of Juda, Mount Sion, which he loved; and he built, like [that] of unicorns, his sanctuary in the land [earth], which he founded unto the ages.” St. Jerome, in the Epitaph of Paula: “Why should I relate Shiloh, in which the altar, [now] destroyed, is today shown?” And in [commenting on] Sophonias [Zephaniah] ch. 1: “Shiloh was the tabernacle, and the ark of the Lord. Scarcely the foundations of the altar are shown.” But here we discern [that] in the sanctity of places, temples, and other similar things, confidence [is] not so to be placed that we may sin licentiously, [or that] we may believe [our] sins will go unpunished, or [that] God’s worship [is] so bound to certain sacred buildings, cities, and places that, from them, to our penalty, with great

(col. 1181)

[…continued from col. 1180.] increase of the divine glory, with the benefit of other nations, and with our own conspicuous disgrace and detriment, [his worship] cannot be transferred away.

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Nicolaus Serarius, S.J., “Question IX. Why did the tabernacle afterward emigrate [depart] from Shiloh?,” in Commentary on Joshua, Volume II, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/serarius-joshua-2/285-question-ix-why-did-the-tabernacle-afterward-emigrate-de/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.