Library / Commentary on Joshua, Volume II

Of the Wars: Caput X

Question XXXII. Who [is] the "Book of the Just" cited in the text?

Cajetan pronounces that it is not clear; but I read nine opinions of others. The first: that it is the book of a certain [man] who is called Jashar, that is, “upright.” So Calvin, in his Latin text. The second: [the opinion] of Calvin’s Genevan disciples, in their French version — that it is the book of an author who is called “director” or “corrector”; for they translate, “Qui n’est pas escrit au livre du droiturier” [“Is it not written in the book of the upright one?”]. The third: [the opinion] of the Talmudists (in the tractate On Foreign Worship [Avodah Zarah]), and of the book which is called Bereshith Rabbah, and of our Lyranus — that it is Genesis itself. The fourth: [the opinion] of Radak — that it is the Pentateuch; and it seems [to be that] of the Chaldaean Paraphrast [Targum], when he says, “Is not this written in the book of the Law?” The fifth: of certain [authors] in Abulensis (questions 84 & 85) — that it is the twelve Minor Prophets. The sixth: in the same place — that it is the Prophet Habakkuk himself. The seventh: of Abulensis himself (question 86) — that it is a certain book constructed by Moses, about past and future things, very similar to our Apocalypse. The eighth: of Masius — that it is ancient commentaries of deeds done, or Annals; and Junius and Tremellius embrace this in [their] annotation on this place. The ninth: of Arias Montano — that the book is [a book] “of the upright,” or “of the upright and equitable,” or, as our [Latin] translates in the plural, “the book of the just” — because, in just and equitable

domestic matters, it teaches about the highest benefits of God toward men, and about their offices and ceremonies toward Him. For in chapter 1, verse 18 [of 2 Samuel], by the Seventy it is called τὸ βιβλίον τοῦ εὐθοῦς (to biblion tou euthous) — that is, “of the upright”; and among us [books] are called “books of duties” which are about duties. But although Arias said that the same [book] could have been written by Gentiles — which I disapproved in the previous question — yet he himself prefers [to think] it was rather penned by some one of the Israelites.

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Nicolaus Serarius, S.J., “Question XXXII. Who [is] the "Book of the Just" cited in the text?,” in Commentary on Joshua, Volume II, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/serarius-joshua-2/204-question-xxxii-who-is-the-book-of-the-just-cited-in-the-/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.