Library / Commentary on Joshua, Volume II

Of the Wars: Caput VIII — The Second War, of Ai [Bellum II. Haiense]

Question V. By what signal roused did the ambush take the city?

The signal, by which those who were in the ambush were called forth from their hiding-place, the Rabbis, Theodoret, Josephus, and Abulensis (q. 10) think to have been that [shield] which [was] raised by Joshua — because it is written (v. 19), “And when he had raised the shield over against the city, the ambush which was lying hidden rose up at once” — just as [one] raised a shield from a ship, in Alexander ab Alexandro (bk. 4, ch. 2); [and] Lysander and others [gave] other signals in the same place. But — that I may not assent — these [reasons] hold me [back]. First: If this signal had been given for calling forth and rousing the ambushers, then, once it was given, Joshua could have let down his hands and done something else. Secondly: Between the ambush and Joshua were interposed Ai, and its valley, and perhaps not a little of other space. How could a signal be given to them, over so trifling a thing, from so distant a place? Thirdly: It had not been agreed between Joshua and the ambushers that, at the raising of such a signal, they should leap out from the ambush. For it was suddenly prescribed to Joshua — and beyond all his own expectation — by God (v. 18). Therefore, even if they had seen this signal, they would not have stirred themselves, nor understood what Joshua wished signified by it. Fourthly: Cajetan, Masius, and others judge [that] this was not the signal for this thing. Fifthly: Joshua saw Ai taken from the ambush and set on fire, [and] the men of Ai pressed from behind and cut down: and yet he remained fixed in the same place, and held [his] hand extended in the same [direction]. He was looking, therefore, at something other than to call the ambush out from [its] hiding-place. I judge, with the already-cited Cajetan and Masius, [that] that raising was a signal and mystery of another thing; but that those who were manning the ambush were roused by other signs to invade the city — [namely] because they heard the shout of battle and the discordant sounds; because they saw the greatest multitude come out of the city, and indeed — toward the end — with the greatest confidence, in no order, and with joyful haste,

(col. 933)

and saw that the walls [were] sufficiently deserted, the gates bare of guards, [and] the city emptied of brave men. Yet if, on account of the authority of Josephus and Theodoret, anyone should wish [to say] the ambushes were roused to the irruption by this raising [of the shield] — not exclusively, provided only that raising be not said to have been made for this alone — [I do not object].

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Nicolaus Serarius, S.J., “Question V. By what signal roused did the ambush take the city?,” in Commentary on Joshua, Volume II, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/serarius-joshua-2/123-question-v-by-what-signal-roused-did-the-ambush-take-the/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.