Library / Commentary on Joshua, Volume II

Of the Wars: Caput VII

Question XXXI. Why were inanimate things, and brute cattle, burned?

Junius, with his [collaborator] Tremellius, answers [that] God condemned, in Achan’s goods and things, “the instruments of contagion.” But surely the [things] which Achan stole were rather the matter of the contagion and sin than [its] instruments. But oxen, asses, and sheep [were] not even the matter. This whole [thing] was therefore done for the utmost detestation of this crime, and for the calling-away of all [men] from it, and for a warning that God’s precepts are to be most accurately kept. For so we read that Dathan and Abiram, with [their] tents, [their] cattle (as it is in the Greek), and all [their] household stuff and substance, utterly perished (Num. 16:31, 32); so [in] Deut. 13:12 and following, where the Israelite cities, if perchance some stain of idolatry had defiled them, are commanded to be utterly burned up, with [their] citizens, cattle, and all household stuff. Whence also they are called by the Jews “niddachoth” [banished] cities, that is, exterminated and proscribed. So (above, ch. 6, q. 38) all the Jericho-things [were] destroyed. But [as to] why not the cloak alone, but the silver too and the gold, were burned up — not without cause might someone be in doubt. For in the previous chapter it was said that these were to be brought into the Lord’s treasuries, and [so] it is said by Abulensis (q. 40). It can be answered, first: that they were indeed unclean before, by the contagion of the Canaanites, but were made much more unclean by the new sacrilege of this Jew: and therefore [were] deemed unworthy to be stored in the sacred treasury of the Lord — just as the impious and sacrilegious Jews afterward judged that the money of Judas was not to be sent into the corban [treasury] (Matt. 27:6). Then: [it was] signified that it not rarely happens that [things] which were gold and silver, and which were about to come, as most noble gifts, into the Lord’s treasuries, [are] burned by everlasting fires through the crime of some one [man]. There is, for example, some youth of good talent, of illustrious character, born for letters, made for all piety and religion. Some depraved [man] lies in wait for him, and depraves him, and makes [it so] that he who was to be most useful and most illustrious in the Church of God becomes a heretic, a worthless [man], and lost. Another had resolved to enter the state of holy religion. But this holy purpose is snatched from him by someone’s wickedness. And what but the Lord’s treasure is [thus] snatched away? Another had now taken up religion, and begun to strive toward all the best [things] with a great zeal of perfection and a keen care. Someone dissuades [him], and so praises to him sloth and idleness that from that most holy endeavor of his he slackens greatly, and passes an idle and little-religious life. Is not he [thereby] turned away from the Lord’s treasury, and made fuel for the eternal fire?

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Nicolaus Serarius, S.J., “Question XXXI. Why were inanimate things, and brute cattle, burned?,” in Commentary on Joshua, Volume II, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/serarius-joshua-2/100-question-xxxi-why-were-inanimate-things-and-brute-cattle/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.