Library / Commentary on Joshua, Volume I

Book II: Teaching what befell the spies in that exploration

Question I. How were the spies able to reach Jericho?

The [things] which could intercept the spies’ access into the Jericho-city seem to someone to have been two. One, the Jordan river itself, which — without a huge miracle — the army of the Israelites could not cross, below ch. 3 v. 15–16. The other, [that] of the enemies — the watch-posts [excubiae] and sentinel-outposts [speculae] disposed at the barriers [claustra] of the routes, and the soldiers’ stations. For that thus [it] was wont to be done, both military discipline and historical experience teach. To the former, someone might say (as from Abulensis quest. 12 [it] is suggested) [that] perhaps these [spies] too crossed by a divine miracle. For God could dry up the channel [alveus] of the river for them, as once for the Israelites in the Red Sea; and could make firm their steps over its waters, as Matt. 14; [he] could — [he] who would transfer them — either make a fish rise up (as the Gentiles once fabled of Amphion), or any other beast whatever; [he] could suddenly constitute either a ship or a bridge, and finally raise [them] into the air, and — in the likeness of Habakkuk (Daniel 14:35), or of that most chaste Ammon, of whom [is spoken] in the Lives of the Fathers, or (as the Jews indeed trifle) an ark [arca] — transport them; or even [that] they themselves, as if [as] winged [birds] (as the ancient fabulators recount [that] Daedalus did), give [themselves] wings and flight. The Lord could indeed [do] these [things], and many others, much [more] and greater — and especially if the other of the spies, as in the Rabbins’ trifles, had been an Angel. But if a miracle of this kind had happened, how would scripture keep silent? how would the spies, now returned, not have narrated [it] before all [things]? For there could be no more accommodated narration for exciting and confirming the minds of all. Therefore the natural manner of crossing [is] to be affirmed, which indeed was either “swimming” [natatus] or rather “wading” [vadatio]. For we read [of] the fords [vada] of the Jordan, Judges 3:28, ch. 12 v. 5, and this ch. 3

(col. 334, below the divider)

—v. 7. As if [to work out] whence, and how, these [spies] had come to Jericho, the Jerichoites would sniff [them] out; [they] followed them “by the way which leads to the fords of the Jordan.” But by those [fords] the whole forces of the Israelites could not afterward wade — because (as below ch. 3 [it will be] said) the river then more vehemently overflowed [exundavit]. And we see, not rarely, [that] by a copiousness of rains, or by the melting of ice and snows, in the space of a very few hours, not the greater rivers [alone], but rivulets and streams [too], so swell [intumescere] — [such] that where before, with almost one step, [it] was allowed to cross, afterward scarcely by little boats [scaphae] is it permitted. And in the praise of strong men we see [it] elsewhere recorded, that, with the same river overflowing, they nevertheless crossed it — 1 Chron. 12:15. But even if to someone, in the Israelites’ camp too, [they] could with the same fortitude of mind cross the fords — yet [how] the whole multitude? so many women, little children, cattle? To the latter. If it should please someone even to invent [comminisci] miracles, [God] could [bring] either ἀορασία [aorasia, “non-seeing, blindness”] and blindness — such as Gen. 19:11, 4 Kings [2 Kings] 6:18 we read — or a lethargic sopor [drowsiness], as 1 [Sam.] 29:7; or a Panic terror, as the same book ch. 14 v. 13; or bring forth something similar. But [it] sufficiently appears [that] there was a marvelous either security [complacency], or sloth [desidia], and stupidity of the Jerichoites, who — in so great a proximity of the enemies — did none of those [things] which even the least skill of the military art prescribes. But of this again elsewhere. Meanwhile [note] that [saying] of Polybius bk. 9: ἡ τῶν ἄλλων ἀπειρία μέγιστον ἐφόδιον γίνεται τοῖς ἐμπείροις πρὸς σωτηρίαν [hē tōn allōn apeiria megiston ephodion ginetai tois empeirois pros sōtērian — reading approximate], that is: “The inexperience [imperitia] of others is the greatest viaticum [way-provision], or aid, to the experienced, for prosperity [safety].”

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Nicolaus Serarius, S.J., “Question I. How were the spies able to reach Jericho?,” in Commentary on Joshua, Volume I, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/serarius-joshua-1/216-question-i-how-were-the-spies-able-to-reach-jericho/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.