For while I ponder with myself the apostolic words, “for there is one God, and one mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus,” I understand well that the causes which moved Paul to repeat with manifest care the unity of God and of Christ the mediator cannot be lacking. And indeed they are not lacking; rather, two are present, of which the one immediately discloses itself, while the other is somewhat more inward and hidden. Accordingly, 1) for the same reason Paul writes, “for there is one God, and one mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus,” for which in the catholic creeds1 we read: “I believe in one God, the Father almighty, creator of heaven and earth, and I believe in one Jesus Christ.” But each profession of the Creeds by its own nature pertains to this: that no less a multitude of gods and mediators be excluded than that the one God of all and the one Mediator of all be affirmed. Therefore Paul inculcates the unity of God and the unity of Christ the mediator for this reason: that his purpose is as much to refute errors concerning the plurality of gods and the multitude of mediators as to defend the truths concerning the one God of all and concerning the one and same common mediator of all, Christ Jesus. For defending and illustrating these truths, these things2 conduce excellently: “Is he God of the Jews only? Is he not also of the Gentiles? Indeed, of the Gentiles also, ἐπείπερ εἷς ὁ θεός, since indeed God is one.” And3 again: “But the justice of God through faith in Jesus Christ4, εἰς πάντας καὶ ἐπὶ πάντας, unto all and upon all who believe in him; for there is no5 distinction. For all have sinned and need—”
—the glory of God.” Then6 elsewhere: “For there is no distinction of Jew and Greek. ὁ γὰρ αὐτὸς7 κύριος πάντων, πλουτῶν8 εἰς πάντας τοὺς ἐπικαλουμένους αὐτόν. For there is one and the same Lord of all, rich unto all who invoke him. For9 everyone whosoever shall invoke the name of the Lord shall be saved.”
But 2) to this cause another succeeds, which can scarcely be explained more fittingly than if it be said that Paul therefore wrote, “for there is one God, and one mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus,” because it was established for him to reduce things which in themselves are various and diverse to a certain supreme unity, and from this to conclude more forcefully that Christians ought consequently to be borne by a common affection toward all men and to be solicitous for the salvation of all, because all things proceed from one and the supreme principle. Indeed, when the Apostle writes, “for there is one God,” by the appellation God he signifies the Father. But the Father is the ultimate principle both of the divine persons and also of all creatures, and therefore the supreme origin of the whole τὸ ὄν, being. Hence Gregory Nazianzen10 calls him ἕνωσις, unition, while Theodore Abucara11 calls him ἀνακεφαλαίωσις, the collection and comprehension in unity of all things which exist. For as Richard of St. Victor12 is the authority, “without doubt the Father alone has it that he be according to principality. For the others are according to reception, and according to the likeness of another. Here, therefore, is gathered why unity is, as it were, specially attributed to him according to this consideration.” Therefore, to say with the Apostle, “for there is one God, and one mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus,” is equivalent to speaking thus—
—“for there is one God the Father, who is from himself, proceeds from no other, and is the font and origin of all; and one mediator of God and men with the Father, by whom he was sent, Christ Jesus.” But when we speak thus, just as we reduce all things to the Father as to the universal cause, so we refer all things to the Son as to the common and universal mediator with the Father.
Paul discourses splendidly concerning this relation, who, having first established this as a theorem13, “we know and have ascertained that an idol is14 nothing in the world, and that there is no15 other God besides that one whom we worship”; and then, having comprehended the superstition of the Gentiles in these words16, “for although there are those who in the17 estimation of men are held to be gods, whether in heaven or on earth”; finally concludes by inference18, ἀλλ᾽ ἡμῖν εἷς θεὸς ὁ πατὴρ ἐξ οὗ τὰ πάντα, καὶ ἡμεῖς εἰς αὐτόν· καὶ εἷς κύριος, Ἰησοῦς Χριστός, δι᾽ οὗ τὰ πάντα, καὶ ἡμεῖς δι᾽ αὐτοῦ, “but for us Christians there is one God the Father, from whom are all things, and we19 unto him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things, and we through him.” Here a) when the Father and Son are enumerated together, the former is named God, the latter Lord, according to the solemn law; b) but this is attributed to the Father, that he be and be believed the supreme20 καὶ μία τῶν πάντων ἀρχή, and the one cause of all, and therefore he in whom21 the august dogma of monarchy shines forth; but c) among those things, both visible and invisible, of which the Father is the principle without principle, the Son excels—
—inasmuch as he proceeded from his substance, consubstantial with him, the first of all and altogether coeternal; and indeed d) proceeded22 as the only-begotten Son, as the Word, as Wisdom, as Power, as he through whom all things were made; and therefore e) as he who by his origin23 and by his personal mark stood as a middle between the Father and all other things. Paul signifies this f) concerning him24, saying: ὅς ἐστιν εἰκὼν τοῦ θεοῦ τοῦ ἀοράτου, πρωτότοκος πάσης κτίσεως, “who is the begotten image of the invisible God, the firstborn25 of every creature.” But why? ὅτι ἐν αὐτῷ ἐκτίσθη τὰ πάντα, τὰ ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς καὶ τὰ ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς, τὰ ὁρατὰ καὶ τὰ ἀόρατα … τὰ πάντα δι᾽ αὐτοῦ καὶ εἰς αὐτὸν ἔκτισται. “Because through him were created all things heavenly and terrestrial, visible and invisible … all things were created through him and26 unto him.” Whence g) nothing is truer than what Alexander of Alexandria27, speaking of God the Father and of the universe of things produced by him, writes as regards the Son: ὧν μεσιτεύουσα φύσις μονογενής, δι᾽ ἧς τὰ ὅλα ἐξ οὐκ ὄντων ἐποίησεν ὁ πατὴρ τοῦ θεοῦ λόγου, ὡς ἐξ αὐτοῦ τοῦ ὄντος πατρὸς γεγέννηται, “between which two the only-begotten nature holds the middle, through whom the Father of God the Word made all things from nothing, but who was begotten from the Father himself who is.”
Footnotes
-
Such is the Nicene Creed; indeed, such are all the Creeds of the East, even the more ancient ones, in which this concordant profession of faith occurs: πιστεύω εἰς ἕνα θεὸν πατέρα, “I believe in one God the Father,” καὶ εἰς ἕνα κύριον Ἰησοῦν Χριστόν, “and in one Jesus Christ.” ↩
-
Rom. III.29. ↩
-
Ibid., vv. 22–24. ↩
-
The clause καὶ ἐπὶ πάντας, “and upon all,” is lacking in several codices, versions, and citations of the Fathers. ↩
-
Namely, with respect to divine benefits a Jew is not worthier than a Gentile, but each is equally unworthy. ↩
-
Rom. X.12–14. ↩
-
The formula ὁ αὐτὸς κύριος πάντων, “the same Lord of all,” plainly corresponds to the other, εἷς ὁ κύριος πάντων, “one Lord of all.” ↩
-
Eph. I.7; II.7. God is called πλοῦτος χάριτος, a wealth of grace, which no multitude of believers, however great, can exhaust. ↩
-
Joel III.5. ↩
-
Orations XXIX and XXXVII. Cf. Petavius, On the Trinity, book IV, chapter XV. ↩
-
Opuscule XLII, vol. I, Bibliotheca Patrum Graeco-Latina, p. 435. ↩
-
In the little book On the Three Appropriations of the Persons in the Trinity, by which he replied to Bernard asking what seemed to him concerning that sentence of Augustine in which unity is attributed to the Father, equality to the Son, and the concord of both to the Holy Spirit. ↩
-
I Cor. VIII.4. ↩
-
That is, that no god of the Gentiles truly exists in the world and the nature of things. ↩
-
The word ἕτερος, other, is of wholly uncertain authority. ↩
-
I Cor. VIII.5. ↩
-
For in this sense λεγόμενοι θεοί, “those called gods,” must be understood, that is, νομιζόμενοι, those reputed. ↩
-
I Cor. VIII.6. ↩
-
Unless εἰς be taken for διά, and the words καὶ ἡμεῖς εἰς αὐτόν be rendered “and we through him,” they will have the same force as καὶ ἡμεῖς αὐτῷ, “and we are his own and devoted to his worship.” ↩
-
In Basil, epistle LXXVIII. ↩
-
Concerning which Athanasius discourses splendidly in the second oration against the Arians. ↩
-
John I.1, 14, 18; III.18; I Cor. I.24. ↩
-
I say by his personal mark, but by no means by nature, which Cyril of Alexandria relates and refutes that the Arians impiously imagined in the first dialogue On the Trinity. ↩
-
Col. I.15–17. ↩
-
It seemed to Johann David Michaelis, in the annotations on this passage, that it was preferable with Isidore of Pelusium to read not πρωτότοκος but πρωτοτόκος, first begetter, and therefore to render the words πρωτοτόκος πάσης κτίσεως: “the first begetter,” that is, “author of all created things.” But there is no need to engage in slender disputes about accents, since πρωτότοκος, from the most frequent usage of speech, is one who is eminent and excels. ↩
-
For he is the principle and end of all things. ↩
-
In Theodoret, Ecclesiastical History, book I, chapter IV. ↩