Library / Theological Commentaries, Part III: On the Division of the Divine Will into First and Second, and on the Universal Extent of the Restored Order

CLXV–CLXXXI · The Patriarchate of Antioch

Section CLXIX

Of what kind, therefore, ought that order of providence to be judged which God has established for men fallen and infected by fault? It ought to be judged, namely, 1) an order in which God is long-suffering toward his creatures and beneficent toward all men. To this also pertain, not obscurely, the things which Isaac the Syrian, Bishop of the city of Nineveh, writes1, saying:

The protection and providence of God is over all men, nor is it seen except by those who have purified themselves from sin and have their mind fixed upon God. But the providence of God is especially manifested to those who for God fall into a great temptation; then they perceive it, and it appears as though to the eyes of the body, by which they see it according to the magnitude and force of the temptation which has befallen them.

Then 2) it ought to be judged an order from which it comes to pass that the present world is a world of grace and is so administered divinely that in it a place for penance and the faculty of returning to one’s senses are never wholly denied. Hence Isaac’s exhortation2 to all sinners:

O you who are condemned, be strengthened by hope; seek the face of the Lord through penance, and you will be sanctified by the sanctification of his countenance, and you will be cleansed from your sins. Run to God, O you who are guilty of sins, because he is able to remit sins and can blot out transgressions. With an oath he says through the prophet3, saying: “As I live, says the Lord, I do not will the death of the sinner, but that he be converted and live.”

Finally, 3) it ought to be judged an order in which even temporal punishments are directed toward the salvation of men. For whether he adorns with benefits or chastises with punishments, God, for as long as we live, has proposed this: that he may amend us, lead us to better fruit, and bless us when corrected.—

But an order distinguished by these endowments is separated by an altogether infinite interval from the order of damnation, and plainly bears the force and countenance of the repaired order, and indeed of that reparation which is universal, efficacious, and active, and pours forth its offices upon absolutely all men.

Nowhere does James teach this more clearly than when he opens the σκοπός of the New Testament and explains the end and fruits of that economy which the Only-begotten discharged after assuming our mortality. And, opening the σκοπός of the New Testament4, he writes:

The covenant which was made through Moses was not yet sealed until this final covenant came, because that first one5 was announced from above, but this one was secured below by a seal. And he who established the covenant died, and thereafter the two covenants were confirmed; and he made the two one, and abrogated the law of precepts in the commandments of his precept, and the necessity of the law was abrogated in the advent of our Lord; and he offered himself for those sacrifices which were of the law; and he was handed over as a lamb to be immolated in place of the lambs of propitiation; and the fatted calf was immolated for us, lest we should need to offer calves of the field. He came and ascended the cross, lest victims and sacrifices should be required from us. He poured out his blood for all men, lest the blood of brute animals should be required from us.

But when he is engaged in proving6 that Christ taught nothing by words pertaining to love which he had not first fulfilled in deed, he says:

Our Savior first did what he taught his own, and he performed in deed what he afterward inculcated in words; for he reconciled our enmity with the Father and so loved us that he handed over his innocence for the guilty, and, beneficent, underwent insults for the impious; and, rich, became poor for us; and, although he was life, died for the dead, and by his death gave life to our mortality.—

And the Son of the Lord of all, the Lord, assumed for us the likeness of a servant7. And he to whom all things were subject was made subject8, that he might absolve us from the servitude of sin… And he repaired our terrestrial nature and made us the salt of truth9, and rescued us from the devouring of the serpent. And he called us the light of the world and saved us from the power of darkness. And from evil he made us good, and from abominable, lovable.

For “the Lord strengthened penitents”10, saying, “I have not come11 to call the just, but sinners to penance.” And again saying12, “There will be joy in heaven over one sinner doing penance more than over ninety-nine just who do not need penance.” Therefore13 the shepherd exercised greater care over the sheep which had perished from his whole flock than over those which had not wandered. “Christ died for sinners, and not for the just.”

Lest this should ever fall from the mind, he inculcates it again14, writing: “Our Savior himself says15, ‘I have not come to call the just, but sinners to penance.’ Our Lord died for sinners, and his death was not in vain.” But when he compares Christ the Lord with Joshua16, he has these things among others:

Joshua slew the unclean nations, and Jesus our Savior overthrew the devil with his army. Joshua made the sun stand still in heaven, and Jesus our Savior darkened the sun at midday when he was crucified. Joshua the son of Nun was the savior of the people, and Jesus our Savior is the Savior of the world.—

Footnotes

  1. On Contempt of the World, chap. XIII, p. 7, in Gallandi, vol. XII. Assemani has more concerning Isaac in Bibliotheca Orientalis, vol. I, pp. 207–444; but his sermons were published again in the year 1770, with renewed care, by Nicephorus Theotokis, whose edition was not in our hands. ↩

  2. Ibid., chap. XIII, p. 9. ↩

  3. Ezek. XXXIII.11; cf. Isa. LXV.2; Rom. X.21; Zech. I.3. ↩

  4. Sermon II, On Love, § VI, p. XIII. ↩

  5. The first covenant was announced from above because it was given by God through Moses to the Israelite people; it was not, however, sealed below, because it was not confirmed by the blood and death of the testator. But Christ sealed and confirmed the second covenant below—that is, on earth—by his blood and death, as is notably handed down in Heb. IX.15 ff. Therefore Augustine says of Christ, Enarration on Psalm LXXXVIII.29: “He is the mediator of the covenant, he the sealer of the covenant, he the surety of the covenant, he the witness of the covenant, he the inheritance of the covenant, he the coheir of the covenant.” ↩

  6. Sermon II, On Love, § XVII, p. XVIII. ↩

  7. Phil. II.6–7. ↩

  8. Luke II.51. ↩

  9. Matt. V.13–14; Mark IX.49; Luke XIV.34. ↩

  10. Sermon VII, On Penance, § VI, p. LVI. ↩

  11. Mark II.17. ↩

  12. Luke XV.7. ↩

  13. Matt. XVIII.12–13; cf. Luke XV.4. ↩

  14. Ibid., § IX, p. LIX. ↩

  15. Matt. IX.13. ↩

  16. Sermon XI, On Circumcision against the Jews, § XII, p. LXXXIV. ↩

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Carlo Passaglia, “Section CLXIX,” in Theological Commentaries, Part III: On the Division of the Divine Will into First and Second, and on the Universal Extent of the Restored Order, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/passaglia-commentaries-3/172-section-clxix/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.