Library / Theological Commentaries, Part III: On the Division of the Divine Will into First and Second, and on the Universal Extent of the Restored Order

CXXXV–CLV · The Fathers of Italy

Section CXLVIII

Unless perhaps these things appear more splendid to someone, which Zeno of Verona subjoined after describing the ruin of the human race1, saying2:

When these things had thus continued for a long time, that most skillful artificer of things, the Son of God, whose wisdom has no end and whose strength has no measure, descended from heaven through love of his own image. He illumines the lodging of the virginal womb, and there encloses God in man3. He makes use both of mortal appearance and mortal condition4. He teaches that justice procures immortality; by deeds he consummates the precepts. Finally, he underwent death so that, when it had been conquered, by rising again he might through man—the man whom he bore—both bring to man the hope of conquering death and admit him to the rewards of immortality. Thus it came about that, just as through the condemnation of one condemnation extended to all men, so through the justification of one the justification of eternal life might extend to all men5. Do you now see clearly that there was providence in the assumption of man, a mystery in the Passion, and the highest good in the Resurrection?

Certainly we see 1) that there was providence in the assumption of man, and we have its very fountain and the noble origin of this providence among things known and ascertained. For the love with which the Only-begotten pursued his own image brought it about that he himself descended from heaven, illumined the lodging of the virginal womb, and completed the human οἰκονομία even unto the cross. But he completed it by that order of providence in such a way that, after the manner of a most skillful artificer, he did not cast away his work, but wisely repaired it after it had fallen and forcefully vindicated it into liberty after it had been sold and taken captive.

We see 2) the mystery of the Passion and death tending to this: that the triumph over death to be borne away by all might be foreshadowed in the head, that hope of it might be given to all, and that all might promise themselves the reward of immortality.

Finally, we see 3) the highest good in the Resurrection, in which is contained the fullest sealing of universal reparation. To Zeno is added Jerome, a witness greater than every exception to this universal reparation through Christ. After he has brought forward the words of Scripture6, “Behold the Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world,” and appended this commentary to them7, “But the blood itself is precious in which we are redeemed in the Passion of the Lord and Savior, whose flesh we eat and whose blood we drink,” with only a few things interposed he proceeds8:

For he assumed a human body and through sin destroyed sin, who grieves for us and bears our infirmities; then, “for his house,” which is written in the Seventy but is not contained in the Hebrew: that is, for the Church and for all the people of the earth, namely, for the whole human race. For he is the Savior of all men, especially of the faithful, and he himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only, but for the whole world.

Footnotes

  1. Book I, tractate XII, § II, pp. 86–88. ↩

  2. Ibid., § III, p. 88. ↩

  3. Speaking in book II, tractate IX, § I, concerning the divine nature of the Only-begotten, Zeno teaches that it is such “as the world and the magnitude of the world do not contain.” What, therefore, do those things which we read here, “he encloses God in man,” mean? They mean this alone: that the Son of God was truly made man, which is declared most splendidly in book II, tractate VIII, § II, in these words: “At the appointed time the Son of God, meanwhile dissembling his majesty, departed from the ethereal seat and pitches camp for himself in the temple of the predestined Virgin. Secretly infused into that camp, he is about to be born as man, and there, preserving what he was, meditates becoming what he was not.” ↩

  4. Lactantius had written things most similar to these, book VI, chap. X, n. 1. ↩

  5. Rom. V.18. ↩

  6. John I.29. ↩

  7. Commentary on Ezekiel, book XIV, chap. XLVI, col. 571, works, vol. V. ↩

  8. Ibid., cols. 571–572. ↩

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Carlo Passaglia, “Section CXLVIII,” in Theological Commentaries, Part III: On the Division of the Divine Will into First and Second, and on the Universal Extent of the Restored Order, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/passaglia-commentaries-3/151-section-cxlviii/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.