Library / Theological Commentaries, Part III: On the Division of the Divine Will into First and Second, and on the Universal Extent of the Restored Order

XCIX–CXII · The African Church

Section CIII

And for this reason he gives to all the opportunity and power to be advanced from children of wrath to the glory and excellence of the sons of God.

For it is written, says Tertullian1, “To those who believed in him, he gave power that they should be called sons of God.” The Lord very frequently pronounced God to be our Father. Indeed, he commanded us not to call anyone on earth father except him whom we have in heaven… Blessed are they who—

—acknowledge the Father.

But all can acknowledge him, because2 there is no one whom God does not invite to a reward, no one3 for whom his grace and favor are not at hand, and no one4 whose salvation he does not eagerly will.

He never fails to manifest this benignity of will, and has demonstrated it by a manifold abundance of benefits. He manifested it toward5 the first parents,

deferring the destruction of the devil by the same counsel by which he ordained the restoration of man. For he gave space for the contest, so that man might crush the enemy by the same freedom of choice by which he had fallen before him, proving the fault to be his own and not God’s; and thus might worthily recover salvation through victory, and the devil might be punished more bitterly, conquered by him whom he had formerly crushed; and God might be found so much the more good, awaiting man’s return to paradise more glorious, now to the permission of plucking the tree of life.

He afterward manifested it toward the human race universally, and therefore6

both gathered a people to himself7 and cherished it with many largesses of his goodness; and, having so often found it most ungrateful, always exhorted it to penance; and sent forth the mouths of all the prophets to prophesy; afterward he promised the grace by which, in the extremities of the times, he would illuminate the whole world through his Spirit; and he commanded that the baptism of penance go before, so that those whom he called through grace to the promise appointed for the seed of Abraham—

—he might prepare beforehand through the seal of penance.—John was not silent, saying, “Enter upon penance; for salvation has now drawn near to the nations,” namely, the Lord bringing it according to God’s promise. Ministering penance beforehand, he appointed it to preside over the purification of minds: so that, sweeping, scraping, and casting outside whatever ancient error had defiled, whatever ignorance had contaminated in the heart of man, penance might prepare a clean house of the breast for the Holy Spirit who was to come, into which he might willingly bring himself with heavenly goods.

If you seek the rationale of this merciful economy and investigate its intimate origin, you will discover none other than the goodness of God and the sincere purpose of saving the human race.

For there is one title of these goods, adds Tertullian8: the salvation of man, with the abolition of former crimes having been sent before. This is the cause of penance; this its work: attending to the business of divine mercy. What9 profits man serves God.

Whence nothing is more evident than that the order of divine providence is so disposed that works of clemency go before and works of severity follow; and that men do not experience God as angry before they have perceived him as the benevolent and all-good Parent.

Therefore, says Tertullian10, even unto the offense of man, God from the beginning was only good; thence he was Judge and severe and, as the Marcionites will, cruel… Thus God’s goodness was prior according to nature; severity was posterior according to cause. The former was unbegotten; the latter accidental; the former proper, the latter adapted; the former emitted, the latter employed. For neither ought nature to have contained an inoperative goodness, nor ought the cause to have escaped a severity kept concealed. God furnished the one to himself, the other to the circumstance.

And shortly afterward11:

By these means we show that he came forth with goodness as the author of all things, so that goodness itself must be judged unbegotten and natural to God, not adventitious, since it is found in the Lord as the arbiter of his works. But when evil afterward burst forth, and from that point God’s goodness began to deal with the adversary, that same justice of God obtained another business, namely, that of directing goodness12 according to opposition; so that13, with the liberality by which God is good even of his own accord having been set apart, it may be weighed according to the merits of each, offered to the worthy, denied to the unworthy, taken away from the ungrateful, and consequently vindicated against all rivals. Thus this whole work of justice is the administration of goodness: that by judging it condemns, by condemning it punishes, and, as you say, it rages—assuredly it profits unto good, not unto evil. Finally, fear of judgment conduces to good, not to evil. For it did not suffice that the good should be commended by itself, now laboring under an adversary. For although commendable by itself, it was nevertheless not also capable of being preserved, since it was now capable of being conquered by the adversary, unless some force of fear went before, which would compel even the unwilling to seek and preserve the good.

To these he finally adds14:

To such a degree is justice also the fullness of divinity itself, exhibiting God perfect both as Father and Lord: as Father by clemency, as Lord by discipline; as Father by gentle power, as Lord by severe power; as Father to be loved piously, as Lord to be feared necessarily; to be loved because he prefers mercy to sacrifice, and to be feared because he does not will sin; to be loved because he prefers the penance of the sinner to death, and to be feared because he does not will sinners who are now no longer penitent.

Footnotes

  1. On Prayer, chap. II, pp. 149–150. ↩

  2. On Penance, chap. IV, pp. 141–142. ↩

  3. On Prayer, chap. III, p. 150. ↩

  4. Ibid., chap. IV, p. 150. ↩

  5. Against Marcion, book II, chap. X, p. 462. That Marcion himself thought no differently concerning the amplitude of the salutary will is proved by the things which Tertullian writes in book I, chap. XIV, p. 439:

    Finally, carry yourself around yourself; consider man within and without. Even this work of our God will please you, which that better god, your lord, loved: on account of which he labored to descend from the third heaven into these poor elements; for whose sake he was even crucified in this cell of the Creator.

    ↩
  6. On Penance, chap. II, p. 140. ↩

  7. “I do not refer this,” says la Cerda, “with the interpreters solely to the age of Moses; rather, from the very sons of Adam, God chose for himself certain worshipers of virtue, beginning with Seth himself, the son of Adam, as may be seen in Augustine’s books On the City of God, where he forms the city of God from Adam himself through his son Seth.” ↩

  8. On Penance, chap. II, p. 140. ↩

  9. As though he said: God does not need penance, but you need it; and because your affair is being treated, it therefore yields to the service of God. Not very different from these are the words of Chrysostom, who in the second discourse Against the Jews speaks thus in the name of God: Μὴ γὰρ ἐμὲ ἠδικήσατε, μὴ γὰρ ἐμοὶ ἐγένετο βλάβη, ὑμεῖς ἑαυτοὺς ἠτιμάσατε, τὴν ἐμὴν οὐκ ἠλαττώσατε δόξαν, ἀλλὰ τὴν ὑμετέραν. “You did not injure me, nor was any harm done to me; you affected yourselves with ignominy; you did not diminish my glory, but your own.” ↩

  10. Against Marcion, book II, chap. XI, p. 462. ↩

  11. Ibid., chaps. XII–XIII, p. 463. ↩

  12. Namely, of goodness to be directed according as each one turns his disposition toward the goodness of God. ↩

  13. These establish this sense: that, with the liberality of divine goodness, by which God is good even of his own accord, set apart, that divine goodness may now be weighed according to the merits of each. ↩

  14. Against Marcion, book II, chap. XIII, p. 464. ↩

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Carlo Passaglia, “Section CIII,” in Theological Commentaries, Part III: On the Division of the Divine Will into First and Second, and on the Universal Extent of the Restored Order, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/passaglia-commentaries-3/106-section-ciii/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.