Library / Theological Commentaries, Part III: On the Division of the Divine Will into First and Second, and on the Universal Extent of the Restored Order

XCIX–CXII · The African Church

Section CI

For what we enumerated in the first place, he handed down when, expounding1 the Savior’s words “Thy will be done,” he wrote:

According to this form we add, “Thy will be done”2 “in heaven and on earth,” not because anyone opposes the doing of God’s will and we pray for the success3 of his will; but we ask that his will be done in all. For according to the figurative interpretation of flesh and spirit4, we are heaven and earth.—Although, even if it is to be understood simply, the sense of the petition is nevertheless the same: that God’s will be done in us on earth, so that it may also be done, namely, in heaven. But what does God will except that we walk according to his discipline? Therefore we ask that he furnish us the substance and faculty of his will, that we may be saved both in heaven and on earth, because the sum5 of his will is the salvation of those whom he has adopted… For there is nothing evil in God’s will, even if something is inflicted according to the merits of each.

Entirely excellent and most suitable for effecting what we will; for nothing is either more illustrious than the words “the sum of the divine will is the salvation of those whom he has adopted,” or more suitable than the statement that God’s will toward men is benevolent even when they are visited, according to their own merits, by the severity of justice.

Lest these words be judged to have been said concerning some alone, four things chiefly prevent it: 1) their agreement with that doctrine which was common to ecclesiastical writers; then 2) the things which precede in Tertullian; then 3) the things which follow in the same author; and finally 4) what he himself has concerning the amplitude and ambit of those effects which proceed from the salutary divine will. Indeed, let the things which we brought forward in explaining the doctrine of the Alexandrian Church6 be recalled, and likewise let those which we have just transcribed from Gregory of Nyssa and John Cassian be recalled. It will be manifest that all these things cannot be reconciled ἁρμονικῶς, harmoniously, with Tertullian’s words unless what he says—that the sum of the divine will is the salvation of those whom he has adopted—is understood of the will which is ἡ σωτηρία τῶν ἀνθρώπων, the salvation of men.

The preceding things also demand this interpretation. For, explaining7 the words “Hallowed be thy name,” he writes:

As far as concerns our petition, when we say, “Hallowed be thy name,” we ask that it be hallowed8 in us, who are in him, and at the same time also in the others whom the grace of God still awaits; so that in this also we may obey the precept by praying9 for all, even for our enemies. And therefore, suspending the expression and not saying “Hallowed in us,” we say “in all.”

Nor do the things which follow look to anything else. Concerning that part of the Lord’s Prayer by which we ask “Thy kingdom come,” he determines thus10:

“Thy kingdom come” also pertains to what was said, “Thy will be done,” namely, in us. For when does God11 not reign, in whose hand is the heart of all kings? But whatever we desire for ourselves, we augur for him and attribute to him what we expect from him. Therefore, if the manifestation of the Lord’s kingdom12 pertains to God’s will and to our suspense13, how do some ask for a certain prolongation in the age14, when the kingdom of God whose coming we pray for tends toward the consummation of the age? We desire to reign sooner and not to serve any longer. Even if it had not been prescribed in the prayer to ask for the coming of the kingdom, of our own accord we would have uttered that expression, hastening to the embrace of our hope.

Therefore, of its own accord and by its native weight, the divine will is carried to this: that it may manifest the heavenly kingdom to all, unless those same men oppose it. For if the fullest charity is required of us, and we are commanded to pray for all that the sanctification of the divine name may shine forth in them, much fuller is the merciful benignity of God, which anticipates all, takes possession of all, and leaves altogether no one destitute of its light and heat.

Footnotes

  1. On Prayer, chap. IV, pp. 150–151. ↩

  2. Tertullian omits the particle as, ὡς; and what is in the singular form in Greek, ἐν οὐρανῷ, he renders in the plural, “in heaven.” ↩

  3. Cyprian and Venantius Fortunatus repeat these things, following Tertullian, when they too explain the Lord’s Prayer. ↩

  4. Cyprian, Venantius, Gregory Nazianzen in oration I, and Florus in his exposition of the Mass are likewise authors of the same figurative interpretation. Florus says:

    We can also understand by heaven and earth the spirit and the flesh, since the spirit is known to be from heaven and the flesh from earth; but the spirit seeks heavenly things, the flesh desires earthly things, and therefore we ask that, with these two agreeing, we may do the will of God.

    ↩
  5. Gregory of Nyssa agrees perfectly in discourse IV on the Lord’s Prayer: γενηθήτω τὸ θέλημά σου· θέλημα δὲ θεοῦ ἡ σωτηρία τῶν ἀνθρώπων ἐστίν: “Thy will be done; but the will of God is the salvation of men.” Nor does Cassian disagree, Conference IX, chap. XIX, saying:

    Or certainly it is to be understood in this manner: the will of God is the salvation of all, according to that statement of blessed Paul, “who wills all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.” Therefore, saying to him, “Thy will be done as in heaven and on earth,” in other words we pray this to him: that just as those who are in heaven, so all who dwell on earth may likewise be saved through knowledge of thee.

    ↩
  6. §§ LXXII ff. ↩

  7. On Prayer, chap. III, p. 150. ↩

  8. According to Cyril of Alexandria on the second chapter of Amos, ἁγιάζειν λέγονται τὸν θεὸν οἱ ζῶντες ὀρθῶς, “those who live rightly are said to sanctify God.” Jerome does not depart in the least from this interpretation when he writes in the third book Against the Pelagians: “They desire to sanctify in themselves the name of God, which is holy in itself.” ↩

  9. Venantius Fortunatus supplies a perspicuous commentary on these words, saying:

    We see that he desires his name to be sanctified not only in us but also in those who have not yet merited to attain the grace of baptism; for in the most full charity of Christ we are taught to pray even for our enemies, because he himself freed from the prison of death not friends and faithful men, but his adversaries and the guilty.

    ↩
  10. On Prayer, chap. V, p. 151. ↩

  11. Cyprian speaks in the same manner: “For when does God not reign? Or when does that begin with him which both always was and does not cease to be?” ↩

  12. By this word, customary among African writers, that is expressed which we call the setting of a present thing before one. ↩

  13. Venantius Fortunatus declares what kind of thing this suspense of ours is, saying: “We who plant all our hope in the possession of the future kingdom.” Hence we hang in mind even unto the fruit, lest

    Fertile fields deceive by counterfeit grass.

    ↩
  14. Some read pertractum, without, as I judge, any difference in signification. ↩

Preview of the quotation image

Drag across the words below to colour them in the picture.

To cite this page

Carlo Passaglia, “Section CI,” in Theological Commentaries, Part III: On the Division of the Divine Will into First and Second, and on the Universal Extent of the Restored Order, English translation, Mind of the Church, https://mindofthechurch.com/works/passaglia-commentaries-3/104-section-ci/.

Receive the new translations

One email when a new work or note is published — nothing else, ever.